Terrorism falls in the category of organized crime. This is a common feature of most of such criminal activities that the agenda that inspires that crime is highlighted a great deal. What I observe is that this is a peculiar feature of terrorrism that although it initiated with the fervor of stringent agenda or temporary demands behind it, off late it has lost the patronage of reason and rationality(be it negative) behind it.
If you take the example of any other organized crime whether in India or the world, viz Naxalite, Maoist or any kind of separatist movement is strongly backed by a manifesto, a charter of permanent and temporary agendas. Infact most of them propose their separate constitution. This essential feature of unlawful movements is atypically missing in terrorist activities to a large extent.
A close examination of any of the terrorist incident will reveal that it happened only because they were resolute to conduct it, we were resolute to abstain them and nothing else. What I want to emphasize is that progressively terrorism is losing its "ism" and terror is dominating. Terrorist organizations are organized at such a large scale and in so many parts of the world that such a high degree of integrity is not possible among all such organizations operating in different parts of the world that would avoid the formation of factions and occurrence of clashes amongst the different organizations itself. But there have been almost no clashes between these groups. It never occurred that the demands ever mismatched even in insignificant details. This fact itself proves that there is a lack of governmental characteristic in terrorism.
In my views this fact should be put to scornful use to emphasize upon them that their movement has lost its direction it is nothing accept fanaticism and that to directionless.
The purpose behind emphasizing is not to initiate negotiations or some compromise. Infact the lack of governmental characteristic as remarked earlier itself debars any kind of negotiations. However it can provide a face to the faceless menace. This is beyond denial that there are people in our own country that can be termed as the moderate wing of the terrorists but they do not dare or rather prefer to be captioned as such. An urge highlighting the lack of organizational character would definitely incite them. Somebody has very rightly remarked the solution for a problem related to religious fanaticism can’t be solved without striking a chord of religious nature. The people talked above by me are principal promoters of the concept of un-communalization of terrorism. Unfortunately, no groups with latent political interests can afford difference from the expressions like “Aatankwadiyon ka koi majhab nahi hota” and such expressions commit the shrewd act of very tactfully pulling out islam from “Islamic Terrorism”.
What I suggest would definitely give birth to organizations similar to the Huriyat Conference which are to be dealt with diplomatically. But it is far easier than to deploy our valuable security resources and still live bulldozed with internal fears.
Most notably, this will make the talked about religious community accountable towards incidents of terror.
